|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2011 Intel Corporation
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software and
|
|
|
|
* its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided
|
|
|
|
* that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that
|
|
|
|
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting
|
|
|
|
* documentation, and that the name of the copyright holders not be used in
|
|
|
|
* advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software
|
|
|
|
* without specific, written prior permission. The copyright holders make
|
|
|
|
* no representations about the suitability of this software for any
|
|
|
|
* purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS
|
|
|
|
* SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND
|
|
|
|
* FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY
|
|
|
|
* SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER
|
|
|
|
* RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF
|
|
|
|
* CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
|
|
|
|
* CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/wait.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <unistd.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <string.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/input.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "compositor.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "tablet-shell-server-protocol.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* TODO: Don't fade back from black until we've received a lockscreen
|
|
|
|
* attachment.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enum {
|
|
|
|
STATE_STARTING,
|
|
|
|
STATE_LOCKED,
|
|
|
|
STATE_HOME,
|
|
|
|
STATE_SWITCHER,
|
|
|
|
STATE_TASK
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell {
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource resource;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener lock_listener;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener unlock_listener;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener destroy_listener;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_compositor *compositor;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_process process;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_input_device *device;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_client *client;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *surface;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *lockscreen_surface;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener lockscreen_listener;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_layer lockscreen_layer;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *home_surface;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_layer homescreen_layer;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *switcher_surface;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener switcher_listener;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_client *current_client;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int state, previous_state;
|
|
|
|
int long_press_active;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_event_source *long_press_source;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_client {
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource resource;
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_client *client;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *surface;
|
|
|
|
char *name;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_destroy(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct tablet_shell *
|
|
|
|
get_shell(struct weston_compositor *compositor)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct wl_listener *l;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l = wl_signal_get(&compositor->destroy_signal, tablet_shell_destroy);
|
|
|
|
if (l)
|
|
|
|
return container_of(l, struct tablet_shell, destroy_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
tablet_shell_sigchld(struct weston_process *process, int status)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(process, struct tablet_shell, process);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->process.pid = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr,
|
|
|
|
"weston-tablet-shell crashed, exit code %d\n", status);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(struct tablet_shell *shell, int state)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
static const char *states[] = {
|
|
|
|
"STARTING", "LOCKED", "HOME", "SWITCHER", "TASK"
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "switching to state %s (from %s)\n",
|
|
|
|
states[state], states[shell->state]);
|
|
|
|
shell->previous_state = shell->state;
|
|
|
|
shell->state = state;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_surface_configure(struct weston_surface *surface,
|
|
|
|
int32_t sx, int32_t sy)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = get_shell(surface->compositor);
|
|
|
|
int32_t width, height;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (weston_surface_is_mapped(surface))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
width = surface->buffer->width;
|
|
|
|
height = surface->buffer->height;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_configure(surface, 0, 0, width, height);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (surface == shell->lockscreen_surface) {
|
|
|
|
wl_list_insert(&shell->lockscreen_layer.surface_list,
|
|
|
|
&surface->layer_link);
|
|
|
|
} else if (surface == shell->switcher_surface) {
|
|
|
|
/* */
|
|
|
|
} else if (surface == shell->home_surface) {
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_STARTING) {
|
|
|
|
/* homescreen always visible, at the bottom */
|
|
|
|
wl_list_insert(&shell->homescreen_layer.surface_list,
|
|
|
|
&surface->layer_link);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_LOCKED);
|
|
|
|
shell->previous_state = STATE_HOME;
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_show_lockscreen(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else if (shell->current_client &&
|
|
|
|
shell->current_client->surface != surface &&
|
|
|
|
shell->current_client->client == surface->surface.resource.client) {
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_TASK);
|
|
|
|
shell->current_client->surface = surface;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
weston_zoom_run(surface, 0.3, 1.0, NULL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_list_insert(&shell->compositor->surface_list, &surface->link);
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_assign_output(surface);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
handle_lockscreen_surface_destroy(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(listener,
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell, lockscreen_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->lockscreen_surface = NULL;
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, shell->previous_state);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_lockscreen(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *surface_resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *es = surface_resource->data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_set_position(es, 0, 0);
|
|
|
|
shell->lockscreen_surface = es;
|
|
|
|
shell->lockscreen_surface->configure = tablet_shell_surface_configure;
|
|
|
|
shell->lockscreen_listener.notify = handle_lockscreen_surface_destroy;
|
|
|
|
wl_signal_add(&es->surface.resource.destroy_signal,
|
|
|
|
&shell->lockscreen_listener);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
handle_switcher_surface_destroy(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(listener,
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell, switcher_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->switcher_surface = NULL;
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state != STATE_LOCKED)
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, shell->previous_state);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_switcher(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *surface_resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *es = surface_resource->data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: Switcher should be centered and the compositor
|
|
|
|
* should do the tinting of the background. With the cache
|
|
|
|
* layer idea, we should be able to hit the framerate on the
|
|
|
|
* fade/zoom in. */
|
|
|
|
shell->switcher_surface = es;
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_set_position(shell->switcher_surface, 0, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->switcher_listener.notify = handle_switcher_surface_destroy;
|
|
|
|
wl_signal_add(&es->surface.resource.destroy_signal,
|
|
|
|
&shell->switcher_listener);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_homescreen(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *surface_resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->home_surface = surface_resource->data;
|
|
|
|
shell->home_surface->configure = tablet_shell_surface_configure;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_set_position(shell->home_surface, 0, 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
minimize_zoom_done(struct weston_zoom *zoom, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_compositor *compositor = shell->compositor;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_input_device *device =
|
|
|
|
(struct weston_input_device *) compositor->input_device;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_activate(shell->home_surface, device);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_switch_to(struct tablet_shell *shell,
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *surface)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_compositor *compositor = shell->compositor;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_input_device *device =
|
|
|
|
(struct weston_input_device *) compositor->input_device;
|
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *current;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_SWITCHER) {
|
|
|
|
wl_list_remove(&shell->switcher_listener.link);
|
|
|
|
shell->switcher_surface = NULL;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (surface == shell->home_surface) {
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_HOME);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->current_client && shell->current_client->surface) {
|
|
|
|
current = shell->current_client->surface;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
weston_zoom_run(current, 1.0, 0.3,
|
|
|
|
minimize_zoom_done, shell);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "switch to %p\n", surface);
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_activate(surface, device);
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_TASK);
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
weston_zoom_run(surface, 0.3, 1.0, NULL, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_show_grid(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *surface_resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *es = surface_resource->data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_switch_to(shell, es);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_show_panels(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *surface_resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_surface *es = surface_resource->data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_switch_to(shell, es);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
destroy_tablet_client(struct wl_resource *resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_client *tablet_client =
|
|
|
|
container_of(resource, struct tablet_client, resource);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
free(tablet_client->name);
|
|
|
|
free(tablet_client);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_client_destroy(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
wl_resource_destroy(resource);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_client_activate(struct wl_client *client, struct wl_resource *resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_client *tablet_client = resource->data;
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = tablet_client->shell;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->current_client = tablet_client;
|
|
|
|
if (!tablet_client->surface)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_switch_to(shell, tablet_client->surface);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct tablet_client_interface tablet_client_implementation = {
|
|
|
|
tablet_client_destroy,
|
|
|
|
tablet_client_activate
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_create_client(struct wl_client *client,
|
|
|
|
struct wl_resource *resource,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t id, const char *name, int fd)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = resource->data;
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_compositor *compositor = shell->compositor;
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_client *tablet_client;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_client = malloc(sizeof *tablet_client);
|
|
|
|
if (tablet_client == NULL) {
|
|
|
|
wl_resource_post_no_memory(resource);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->client = wl_client_create(compositor->wl_display, fd);
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->shell = shell;
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->name = strdup(name);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->resource.destroy = destroy_tablet_client;
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->resource.object.id = id;
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->resource.object.interface =
|
|
|
|
&tablet_client_interface;
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->resource.object.implementation =
|
|
|
|
(void (**)(void)) &tablet_client_implementation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_client_add_resource(client, &tablet_client->resource);
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->surface = NULL;
|
|
|
|
shell->current_client = tablet_client;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fprintf(stderr, "created client %p, id %d, name %s, fd %d\n",
|
|
|
|
tablet_client->client, id, name, fd);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const struct tablet_shell_interface tablet_shell_implementation = {
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_lockscreen,
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_switcher,
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_homescreen,
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_show_grid,
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_show_panels,
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_create_client
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
launch_ux_daemon(struct tablet_shell *shell)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const char *shell_exe = LIBEXECDIR "/weston-tablet-shell";
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
shell->client = weston_client_launch(shell->compositor,
|
|
|
|
&shell->process,
|
|
|
|
shell_exe, tablet_shell_sigchld);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
toggle_switcher(struct tablet_shell *shell)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
switch (shell->state) {
|
|
|
|
case STATE_SWITCHER:
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_hide_switcher(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_show_switcher(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_SWITCHER);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_lock(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(listener, struct tablet_shell, lock_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_LOCKED)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_SWITCHER)
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_hide_switcher(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_show_lockscreen(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_LOCKED);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
desktop-shell: screen locking protocol
Add protocol and functions for supporting screen locking, triggered by
activity timeout.
After activity timeout, compositor starts the fade to black, and then
enters SLEEPING state. At that point it calls lock() in the shell
plugin.
When input events trigger a wakeup, unlock() in the shell plugin is
called. This sends prepare_lock_surface event to the desktop-shell
client. The screen stays locked while the compositor starts fade-in.
At this point, desktop-shell client usually creates a surface for the
unlocking GUI (e.g. a password prompt), and sends it with the
set_lock_surface request. The compositor supposedly shows and allows
interaction only with the given lock surface (not yet implemented).
When desktop-shell has authenticated the user, or instead of issuing
set_lock_surface, it sends the unlock request. Upon receiving the unlock
request, the shell plugin unlocks the screen.
If desktop-shell client dies, the screen is unlocked automatically.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
13 years ago
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_unlock(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
|
desktop-shell: screen locking protocol
Add protocol and functions for supporting screen locking, triggered by
activity timeout.
After activity timeout, compositor starts the fade to black, and then
enters SLEEPING state. At that point it calls lock() in the shell
plugin.
When input events trigger a wakeup, unlock() in the shell plugin is
called. This sends prepare_lock_surface event to the desktop-shell
client. The screen stays locked while the compositor starts fade-in.
At this point, desktop-shell client usually creates a surface for the
unlocking GUI (e.g. a password prompt), and sends it with the
set_lock_surface request. The compositor supposedly shows and allows
interaction only with the given lock surface (not yet implemented).
When desktop-shell has authenticated the user, or instead of issuing
set_lock_surface, it sends the unlock request. Upon receiving the unlock
request, the shell plugin unlocks the screen.
If desktop-shell client dies, the screen is unlocked automatically.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
13 years ago
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(listener, struct tablet_shell, lock_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
weston_compositor_wake(shell->compositor);
|
desktop-shell: screen locking protocol
Add protocol and functions for supporting screen locking, triggered by
activity timeout.
After activity timeout, compositor starts the fade to black, and then
enters SLEEPING state. At that point it calls lock() in the shell
plugin.
When input events trigger a wakeup, unlock() in the shell plugin is
called. This sends prepare_lock_surface event to the desktop-shell
client. The screen stays locked while the compositor starts fade-in.
At this point, desktop-shell client usually creates a surface for the
unlocking GUI (e.g. a password prompt), and sends it with the
set_lock_surface request. The compositor supposedly shows and allows
interaction only with the given lock surface (not yet implemented).
When desktop-shell has authenticated the user, or instead of issuing
set_lock_surface, it sends the unlock request. Upon receiving the unlock
request, the shell plugin unlocks the screen.
If desktop-shell client dies, the screen is unlocked automatically.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
13 years ago
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
go_home(struct tablet_shell *shell)
|
|
|
|
{
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
struct weston_input_device *device =
|
|
|
|
(struct weston_input_device *) shell->compositor->input_device;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_SWITCHER)
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_send_hide_switcher(&shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_surface_activate(shell->home_surface, device);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_HOME);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static int
|
|
|
|
long_press_handler(void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->long_press_active = 0;
|
|
|
|
toggle_switcher(shell);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
menu_key_binding(struct wl_input_device *device, uint32_t time,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t key, uint32_t button, uint32_t axis, int32_t state, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_LOCKED)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (state)
|
|
|
|
toggle_switcher(shell);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
home_key_binding(struct wl_input_device *device, uint32_t time,
|
|
|
|
uint32_t key, uint32_t button, uint32_t axis, int32_t state, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->state == STATE_LOCKED)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
shell->device = (struct weston_input_device *) device;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (state) {
|
|
|
|
wl_event_source_timer_update(shell->long_press_source, 500);
|
|
|
|
shell->long_press_active = 1;
|
|
|
|
} else if (shell->long_press_active) {
|
|
|
|
wl_event_source_timer_update(shell->long_press_source, 0);
|
|
|
|
shell->long_press_active = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (shell->state) {
|
|
|
|
case STATE_HOME:
|
|
|
|
case STATE_SWITCHER:
|
|
|
|
toggle_switcher(shell);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
go_home(shell);
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
destroy_tablet_shell(struct wl_resource *resource)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
bind_shell(struct wl_client *client, void *data, uint32_t version, uint32_t id)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell = data;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->client != client)
|
|
|
|
/* Throw an error or just let the client fail when it
|
|
|
|
* tries to access the object?. */
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.object.id = id;
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.object.interface = &tablet_shell_interface;
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.object.implementation =
|
|
|
|
(void (**)(void)) &tablet_shell_implementation;
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.client = client;
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.data = shell;
|
|
|
|
shell->resource.destroy = destroy_tablet_shell;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_client_add_resource(client, &shell->resource);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_destroy(struct wl_listener *listener, void *data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell =
|
|
|
|
container_of(listener, struct tablet_shell, destroy_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->home_surface)
|
|
|
|
shell->home_surface->configure = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (shell->lockscreen_surface)
|
|
|
|
shell->lockscreen_surface->configure = NULL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wl_event_source_remove(shell->long_press_source);
|
|
|
|
free(shell);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
shell_init(struct weston_compositor *compositor);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WL_EXPORT void
|
Rename wayland-compositor to weston
This rename addresses a few problems around the split between core
Wayland and the wayland-demos repository.
1) Initially, we had one big repository with protocol code, sample
compositor and sample clients. We split that repository to make it
possible to implement the protocol without pulling in the sample/demo
code. At this point, the compositor is more than just a "demo" and
wayland-demos doesn't send the right message. The sample compositor
is a useful, self-contained project in it's own right, and we want to
move away from the "demos" label.
2) Another problem is that the wayland-demos compositor is often
called "the wayland compsitor", but it's really just one possible
compositor. Existing X11 compositors are expected to add Wayland
support and then gradually phase out/modularize the X11 support, for
example. Conversely, it's hard to talk about the wayland-demos
compositor specifically as opposed to, eg, the wayland protocol or a
wayland compositor in general.
We are also renaming the repo to weston, and the compositor
subdirectory to src/, to emphasize that the main "output" is the
compositor.
13 years ago
|
|
|
shell_init(struct weston_compositor *compositor)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct tablet_shell *shell;
|
|
|
|
struct wl_event_loop *loop;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell = malloc(sizeof *shell);
|
|
|
|
if (shell == NULL)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
memset(shell, 0, sizeof *shell);
|
|
|
|
shell->compositor = compositor;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shell->destroy_listener.notify = tablet_shell_destroy;
|
|
|
|
wl_signal_add(&compositor->destroy_signal, &shell->destroy_listener);
|
|
|
|
shell->lock_listener.notify = tablet_shell_lock;
|
|
|
|
wl_signal_add(&compositor->lock_signal, &shell->lock_listener);
|
|
|
|
shell->unlock_listener.notify = tablet_shell_unlock;
|
|
|
|
wl_signal_add(&compositor->unlock_signal, &shell->unlock_listener);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* FIXME: This will make the object available to all clients. */
|
|
|
|
wl_display_add_global(compositor->wl_display,
|
|
|
|
&tablet_shell_interface, shell, bind_shell);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loop = wl_display_get_event_loop(compositor->wl_display);
|
|
|
|
shell->long_press_source =
|
|
|
|
wl_event_loop_add_timer(loop, long_press_handler, shell);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_compositor_add_binding(compositor, KEY_LEFTMETA, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
home_key_binding, shell);
|
|
|
|
weston_compositor_add_binding(compositor, KEY_RIGHTMETA, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
home_key_binding, shell);
|
|
|
|
weston_compositor_add_binding(compositor, KEY_LEFTMETA, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
MODIFIER_SUPER, home_key_binding, shell);
|
|
|
|
weston_compositor_add_binding(compositor, KEY_RIGHTMETA, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
MODIFIER_SUPER, home_key_binding, shell);
|
|
|
|
weston_compositor_add_binding(compositor, KEY_COMPOSE, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
menu_key_binding, shell);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
weston_layer_init(&shell->homescreen_layer,
|
|
|
|
&compositor->cursor_layer.link);
|
|
|
|
weston_layer_init(&shell->lockscreen_layer,
|
|
|
|
&compositor->cursor_layer.link);
|
|
|
|
launch_ux_daemon(shell);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tablet_shell_set_state(shell, STATE_STARTING);
|
|
|
|
}
|