This seems like a better name, and will not conflict if someone later
extends wl_surface with a request scaler_set (yeah, unlikely).
This code was written by Jonny Lamb, I just diffed his branches and made
a patch for Weston.
Cc: Jonny Lamb <jonny.lamb@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Add cropping and scaling to wl_surface.
Add a global factory interface wl_scaler, which creates
wl_scaler_surface objects tied to a given wl_surface. The
wl_scaler_surface object can be used to set a cropping and scaling
transformation to change how a wl_buffer maps to wl_surface contents.
Changes in v2:
Take into account buffer_transform and buffer_scale, and try to explain
more clearly how the coordinate transformations work and what their
order is. Add, that crop and scale state is double-buffered. Explain
missing dst_x, dst_y. Clarify that undefined content still is some
content, but NULL buffer implies no content nor size.
Changes in v3:
Disallow zero values for dst_width and dst_height.
Open issues:
Should this be a separate interface like here, or just a wl_surface
request?
If we keep this as a separate interface, rename wl_surface_scaler to
wl_viewport.