You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
77 lines
3.4 KiB
77 lines
3.4 KiB
This file is a collection of informal notes, with references to where
|
|
they were originally written. Each note should have a source and date
|
|
mentioned. Let's keep these in date order, newest first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
2012-10-23; Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
|
|
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2012-October/005969.html
|
|
|
|
For anyone wanting to port or write their own window manager to Wayland:
|
|
|
|
Most likely you have a desktop window manager. A quick way to get
|
|
started, is to fork Weston's desktop-shell plugin and start hacking it.
|
|
Qt could be another good choice, but I am not familiar with it.
|
|
|
|
You also need to understand some concepts. I'm repeating things I wrote
|
|
to the wayland-devel list earlier, a little rephrased.
|
|
|
|
We need to distinguish three different things here (towards Wayland
|
|
clients):
|
|
|
|
- compositors (servers)
|
|
All Wayland compositors are indistinguishable by definition,
|
|
since they are Wayland compositors. They only differ in the
|
|
global interfaces they advertise, and for general purpose
|
|
compositors, we should aim to support the same minimum set of
|
|
globals everywhere. For instance, all desktop compositors
|
|
should implement wl_shell. In X, this component corresponds to
|
|
the X server with a built-in compositing manager.
|
|
|
|
- shells
|
|
This is a new concept compared to an X stack. A shell defines
|
|
how a user and applications interact. The most familiar is a
|
|
desktop (environment). If KDE, Gnome, and XFCE are desktop
|
|
environments, they all fall under the *same* shell: the desktop
|
|
shell. You can have applications in windows, several visible at
|
|
the same time, you have keyboards and mice, etc.
|
|
|
|
An example of something that is not a desktop shell
|
|
could be a TV user interface. TV is profoundly different:
|
|
usually no mouse, no keyboard, but you have a remote control
|
|
with some buttons. Freely floating windows probably do not make
|
|
sense. You may have picture-in-picture, but usually not several
|
|
applications showing at once. Most importantly, trying to run
|
|
desktop applications here does not work due to the
|
|
incompatible application and user interface paradigms.
|
|
|
|
On protocol level, a shell is the public shell interface(s),
|
|
currently for desktop it is the wl_shell.
|
|
|
|
- "window managers"
|
|
The X Window Managers correspond to different wl_shell
|
|
implementations, not different shells, since they pratically
|
|
all deal with a desktop environment. You also want all desktop
|
|
applications to work with all window managers, so you need to
|
|
implement wl_shell anyway.
|
|
|
|
I understand there could be special purpose X Window Managers, that
|
|
would better correspond to their own shells. These window managers
|
|
might not implement e.g. EWMH by the spec.
|
|
|
|
When you implement your own window manager, you want to keep the public
|
|
desktop shell interface (wl_shell). You can offer new public
|
|
interfaces, too, but keep in mind, that someone needs to make
|
|
applications use them.
|
|
|
|
In Weston, a shell implementation has two parts: a weston plugin, and a
|
|
special client. For desktop shell (wl_shell) these are src/shell.c and
|
|
clients/desktop-shell.c. The is also a private protocol extension that
|
|
these two can explicitly communicate with.
|
|
|
|
The plugin does window management, and the client does most of user
|
|
interaction: draw backgrounds, panels, buttons, lock screen dialog,
|
|
basically everything that is on screen.
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|