|
|
|
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors.
|
|
|
|
// All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a MIT-style
|
|
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package pull
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"context"
|
|
|
|
"errors"
|
|
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
|
|
"strconv"
|
|
|
|
"strings"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
|
|
|
|
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
|
|
|
|
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
|
|
|
|
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unit"
|
|
|
|
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/graceful"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/notification"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/process"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/queue"
|
|
|
|
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
|
|
|
|
asymkey_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/asymkey"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// prPatchCheckerQueue represents a queue to handle update pull request tests
|
|
|
|
var prPatchCheckerQueue queue.UniqueQueue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
ErrIsClosed = errors.New("pull is closed")
|
|
|
|
ErrUserNotAllowedToMerge = models.ErrDisallowedToMerge{}
|
|
|
|
ErrHasMerged = errors.New("has already been merged")
|
|
|
|
ErrIsWorkInProgress = errors.New("work in progress PRs cannot be merged")
|
|
|
|
ErrIsChecking = errors.New("cannot merge while conflict checking is in progress")
|
|
|
|
ErrNotMergableState = errors.New("not in mergeable state")
|
|
|
|
ErrDependenciesLeft = errors.New("is blocked by an open dependency")
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// AddToTaskQueue adds itself to pull request test task queue.
|
|
|
|
func AddToTaskQueue(pr *issues_model.PullRequest) {
|
|
|
|
err := prPatchCheckerQueue.PushFunc(strconv.FormatInt(pr.ID, 10), func() error {
|
|
|
|
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusChecking
|
|
|
|
err := pr.UpdateColsIfNotMerged("status")
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("AddToTaskQueue(%-v).UpdateCols.(add to queue): %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("Adding %-v to the test pull requests queue", pr)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if err != nil && err != queue.ErrAlreadyInQueue {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Error adding %-v to the test pull requests queue: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010) (#23032)
Backport #23010.
Fix #23000.
The bug was introduced in #22633, and it seems that it has been noticed:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22633#discussion_r1095395359 .
However, #22633 did nothing wrong, the logic should be "check if they is
admin only when `force` is true".
So we should provide the `ForceMerge` when merging from UI.
After this, an admin can also send a normal merge request with
`ForceMerge` false. So it fixes a potential bug: if the admin doesn't
want to do a force merge, they just see the green "Merge" button and
click it. At the same time, the status of the PR changed, and it
shouldn't be merged now, so the admin could send an unexpected force
merge.
In addition, I updated `ForceMerge *bool` to `ForceMerge bool`, I don't
see the reason to use a pointer.
And fixed the logic of CheckPullMergable to handle auto merge and force
merge correctly.
2 years ago
|
|
|
type MergeCheckType int
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
MergeCheckTypeGeneral MergeCheckType = iota // general merge checks for "merge", "rebase", "squash", etc
|
|
|
|
MergeCheckTypeManually // Manually Merged button (mark a PR as merged manually)
|
|
|
|
MergeCheckTypeAuto // Auto Merge (Scheduled Merge) After Checks Succeed
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CheckPullMergable check if the pull mergable based on all conditions (branch protection, merge options, ...)
|
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010) (#23032)
Backport #23010.
Fix #23000.
The bug was introduced in #22633, and it seems that it has been noticed:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22633#discussion_r1095395359 .
However, #22633 did nothing wrong, the logic should be "check if they is
admin only when `force` is true".
So we should provide the `ForceMerge` when merging from UI.
After this, an admin can also send a normal merge request with
`ForceMerge` false. So it fixes a potential bug: if the admin doesn't
want to do a force merge, they just see the green "Merge" button and
click it. At the same time, the status of the PR changed, and it
shouldn't be merged now, so the admin could send an unexpected force
merge.
In addition, I updated `ForceMerge *bool` to `ForceMerge bool`, I don't
see the reason to use a pointer.
And fixed the logic of CheckPullMergable to handle auto merge and force
merge correctly.
2 years ago
|
|
|
func CheckPullMergable(stdCtx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, perm *access_model.Permission, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, mergeCheckType MergeCheckType, adminSkipProtectionCheck bool) error {
|
|
|
|
return db.WithTx(func(ctx context.Context) error {
|
|
|
|
if pr.HasMerged {
|
|
|
|
return ErrHasMerged
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.LoadIssueCtx(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Unable to load issue[%d] for %-v: %v", pr.IssueID, pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
} else if pr.Issue.IsClosed {
|
|
|
|
return ErrIsClosed
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if allowedMerge, err := IsUserAllowedToMerge(ctx, pr, *perm, doer); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Error whilst checking if %-v is allowed to merge %-v: %v", doer, pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
} else if !allowedMerge {
|
|
|
|
return ErrUserNotAllowedToMerge
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010) (#23032)
Backport #23010.
Fix #23000.
The bug was introduced in #22633, and it seems that it has been noticed:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22633#discussion_r1095395359 .
However, #22633 did nothing wrong, the logic should be "check if they is
admin only when `force` is true".
So we should provide the `ForceMerge` when merging from UI.
After this, an admin can also send a normal merge request with
`ForceMerge` false. So it fixes a potential bug: if the admin doesn't
want to do a force merge, they just see the green "Merge" button and
click it. At the same time, the status of the PR changed, and it
shouldn't be merged now, so the admin could send an unexpected force
merge.
In addition, I updated `ForceMerge *bool` to `ForceMerge bool`, I don't
see the reason to use a pointer.
And fixed the logic of CheckPullMergable to handle auto merge and force
merge correctly.
2 years ago
|
|
|
if mergeCheckType == MergeCheckTypeManually {
|
|
|
|
// if doer is doing "manually merge" (mark as merged manually), do not check anything
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pr.IsWorkInProgress() {
|
|
|
|
return ErrIsWorkInProgress
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !pr.CanAutoMerge() && !pr.IsEmpty() {
|
|
|
|
return ErrNotMergableState
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pr.IsChecking() {
|
|
|
|
return ErrIsChecking
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := CheckPullBranchProtections(ctx, pr, false); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
if !models.IsErrDisallowedToMerge(err) {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Error whilst checking pull branch protection for %-v: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010) (#23032)
Backport #23010.
Fix #23000.
The bug was introduced in #22633, and it seems that it has been noticed:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22633#discussion_r1095395359 .
However, #22633 did nothing wrong, the logic should be "check if they is
admin only when `force` is true".
So we should provide the `ForceMerge` when merging from UI.
After this, an admin can also send a normal merge request with
`ForceMerge` false. So it fixes a potential bug: if the admin doesn't
want to do a force merge, they just see the green "Merge" button and
click it. At the same time, the status of the PR changed, and it
shouldn't be merged now, so the admin could send an unexpected force
merge.
In addition, I updated `ForceMerge *bool` to `ForceMerge bool`, I don't
see the reason to use a pointer.
And fixed the logic of CheckPullMergable to handle auto merge and force
merge correctly.
2 years ago
|
|
|
// Now the branch protection check failed, check whether the failure could be skipped (skip by setting err = nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// * when doing Auto Merge (Scheduled Merge After Checks Succeed), skip the branch protection check
|
|
|
|
if mergeCheckType == MergeCheckTypeAuto {
|
|
|
|
err = nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// * if the doer is admin, they could skip the branch protection check
|
|
|
|
if adminSkipProtectionCheck {
|
|
|
|
if isRepoAdmin, errCheckAdmin := access_model.IsUserRepoAdmin(ctx, pr.BaseRepo, doer); errCheckAdmin != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Unable to check if %-v is a repo admin in %-v: %v", doer, pr.BaseRepo, errCheckAdmin)
|
|
|
|
return errCheckAdmin
|
|
|
|
} else if isRepoAdmin {
|
|
|
|
err = nil // repo admin can skip the check, so clear the error
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010) (#23032)
Backport #23010.
Fix #23000.
The bug was introduced in #22633, and it seems that it has been noticed:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22633#discussion_r1095395359 .
However, #22633 did nothing wrong, the logic should be "check if they is
admin only when `force` is true".
So we should provide the `ForceMerge` when merging from UI.
After this, an admin can also send a normal merge request with
`ForceMerge` false. So it fixes a potential bug: if the admin doesn't
want to do a force merge, they just see the green "Merge" button and
click it. At the same time, the status of the PR changed, and it
shouldn't be merged now, so the admin could send an unexpected force
merge.
In addition, I updated `ForceMerge *bool` to `ForceMerge bool`, I don't
see the reason to use a pointer.
And fixed the logic of CheckPullMergable to handle auto merge and force
merge correctly.
2 years ago
|
|
|
// If there is still a branch protection check error, return it
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if _, err := isSignedIfRequired(ctx, pr, doer); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if noDeps, err := issues_model.IssueNoDependenciesLeft(ctx, pr.Issue); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
} else if !noDeps {
|
|
|
|
return ErrDependenciesLeft
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}, stdCtx)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// isSignedIfRequired check if merge will be signed if required
|
|
|
|
func isSignedIfRequired(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, doer *user_model.User) (bool, error) {
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.LoadProtectedBranchCtx(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return false, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pr.ProtectedBranch == nil || !pr.ProtectedBranch.RequireSignedCommits {
|
|
|
|
return true, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sign, _, _, err := asymkey_service.SignMerge(ctx, pr, doer, pr.BaseRepo.RepoPath(), pr.BaseBranch, pr.GetGitRefName())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return sign, err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// checkAndUpdateStatus checks if pull request is possible to leaving checking status,
|
|
|
|
// and set to be either conflict or mergeable.
|
|
|
|
func checkAndUpdateStatus(pr *issues_model.PullRequest) {
|
|
|
|
// If status has not been changed to conflict by testPatch then we are mergeable
|
|
|
|
if pr.Status == issues_model.PullRequestStatusChecking {
|
|
|
|
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusMergeable
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure there is no waiting test to process before leaving the checking status.
|
|
|
|
has, err := prPatchCheckerQueue.Has(strconv.FormatInt(pr.ID, 10))
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Unable to check if the queue is waiting to reprocess %-v. Error: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if has {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("Not updating status for %-v as it is due to be rechecked", pr)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.UpdateColsIfNotMerged("merge_base", "status", "conflicted_files", "changed_protected_files"); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Update[%-v]: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// getMergeCommit checks if a pull request has been merged
|
|
|
|
// Returns the git.Commit of the pull request if merged
|
|
|
|
func getMergeCommit(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest) (*git.Commit, error) {
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.LoadBaseRepoCtx(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to load base repo for %s: %w", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prHeadRef := pr.GetGitRefName()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check if the pull request is merged into BaseBranch
|
|
|
|
if _, _, err := git.NewCommand(ctx, "merge-base", "--is-ancestor").
|
|
|
|
AddDynamicArguments(prHeadRef, pr.BaseBranch).
|
|
|
|
RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: pr.BaseRepo.RepoPath()}); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "exit status 1") {
|
|
|
|
// prHeadRef is not an ancestor of the base branch
|
|
|
|
return nil, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Errors are signaled by a non-zero status that is not 1
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%-v git merge-base --is-ancestor: %w", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If merge-base successfully exits then prHeadRef is an ancestor of pr.BaseBranch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Find the head commit id
|
|
|
|
prHeadCommitID, err := git.GetFullCommitID(ctx, pr.BaseRepo.RepoPath(), prHeadRef)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("GetFullCommitID(%s) in %s: %w", prHeadRef, pr.BaseRepo.FullName(), err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the commit from BaseBranch where the pull request got merged
|
|
|
|
mergeCommit, _, err := git.NewCommand(ctx, "rev-list", "--ancestry-path", "--merges", "--reverse").
|
|
|
|
AddDynamicArguments(prHeadCommitID + ".." + pr.BaseBranch).
|
|
|
|
RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: pr.BaseRepo.RepoPath()})
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("git rev-list --ancestry-path --merges --reverse: %w", err)
|
|
|
|
} else if len(mergeCommit) < git.SHAFullLength {
|
|
|
|
// PR was maybe fast-forwarded, so just use last commit of PR
|
|
|
|
mergeCommit = prHeadCommitID
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
mergeCommit = strings.TrimSpace(mergeCommit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gitRepo, err := git.OpenRepository(ctx, pr.BaseRepo.RepoPath())
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("%-v OpenRepository: %w", pr.BaseRepo, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
defer gitRepo.Close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(mergeCommit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return nil, fmt.Errorf("GetMergeCommit[%s]: %w", mergeCommit, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return commit, nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// manuallyMerged checks if a pull request got manually merged
|
|
|
|
// When a pull request got manually merged mark the pull request as merged
|
|
|
|
func manuallyMerged(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest) bool {
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.LoadBaseRepoCtx(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("%-v LoadBaseRepo: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if unit, err := pr.BaseRepo.GetUnit(unit.TypePullRequests); err == nil {
|
|
|
|
config := unit.PullRequestsConfig()
|
|
|
|
if !config.AutodetectManualMerge {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("%-v BaseRepo.GetUnit(unit.TypePullRequests): %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
commit, err := getMergeCommit(ctx, pr)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("%-v getMergeCommit: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if commit == nil {
|
|
|
|
// no merge commit found
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr.MergedCommitID = commit.ID.String()
|
|
|
|
pr.MergedUnix = timeutil.TimeStamp(commit.Author.When.Unix())
|
|
|
|
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusManuallyMerged
|
|
|
|
merger, _ := user_model.GetUserByEmail(commit.Author.Email)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// When the commit author is unknown set the BaseRepo owner as merger
|
|
|
|
if merger == nil {
|
|
|
|
if pr.BaseRepo.Owner == nil {
|
|
|
|
if err = pr.BaseRepo.GetOwner(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("%-v BaseRepo.GetOwner: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
merger = pr.BaseRepo.Owner
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pr.Merger = merger
|
|
|
|
pr.MergerID = merger.ID
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if merged, err := pr.SetMerged(ctx); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("%-v setMerged : %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
} else if !merged {
|
|
|
|
return false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notification.NotifyMergePullRequest(pr, merger)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
log.Info("manuallyMerged[%-v]: Marked as manually merged into %s/%s by commit id: %s", pr, pr.BaseRepo.Name, pr.BaseBranch, commit.ID.String())
|
|
|
|
return true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// InitializePullRequests checks and tests untested patches of pull requests.
|
|
|
|
func InitializePullRequests(ctx context.Context) {
|
|
|
|
prs, err := issues_model.GetPullRequestIDsByCheckStatus(issues_model.PullRequestStatusChecking)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Find Checking PRs: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, prID := range prs {
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-ctx.Done():
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
if err := prPatchCheckerQueue.PushFunc(strconv.FormatInt(prID, 10), func() error {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("Adding PR[%d] to the pull requests patch checking queue", prID)
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Error adding PR[%d] to the pull requests patch checking queue %v", prID, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// handle passed PR IDs and test the PRs
|
|
|
|
func handle(data ...queue.Data) []queue.Data {
|
|
|
|
for _, datum := range data {
|
|
|
|
id, _ := strconv.ParseInt(datum.(string), 10, 64)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testPR(id)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testPR(id int64) {
|
|
|
|
pullWorkingPool.CheckIn(fmt.Sprint(id))
|
|
|
|
defer pullWorkingPool.CheckOut(fmt.Sprint(id))
|
|
|
|
ctx, _, finished := process.GetManager().AddContext(graceful.GetManager().HammerContext(), fmt.Sprintf("Test PR[%d] from patch checking queue", id))
|
|
|
|
defer finished()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pr, err := issues_model.GetPullRequestByID(ctx, id)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("Unable to GetPullRequestByID[%d] for testPR: %v", id, err)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("Testing %-v", pr)
|
|
|
|
defer func() {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("Done testing %-v (status: %s)", pr, pr.Status)
|
|
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if pr.HasMerged {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("%-v is already merged (status: %s, merge commit: %s)", pr, pr.Status, pr.MergedCommitID)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if manuallyMerged(ctx, pr) {
|
|
|
|
log.Trace("%-v is manually merged (status: %s, merge commit: %s)", pr, pr.Status, pr.MergedCommitID)
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := TestPatch(pr); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("testPatch[%-v]: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusError
|
|
|
|
if err := pr.UpdateCols("status"); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
log.Error("update pr [%-v] status to PullRequestStatusError failed: %v", pr, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
checkAndUpdateStatus(pr)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CheckPrsForBaseBranch check all pulls with bseBrannch
|
|
|
|
func CheckPrsForBaseBranch(baseRepo *repo_model.Repository, baseBranchName string) error {
|
|
|
|
prs, err := issues_model.GetUnmergedPullRequestsByBaseInfo(baseRepo.ID, baseBranchName)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
return err
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for _, pr := range prs {
|
|
|
|
AddToTaskQueue(pr)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Init runs the task queue to test all the checking status pull requests
|
|
|
|
func Init() error {
|
|
|
|
prPatchCheckerQueue = queue.CreateUniqueQueue("pr_patch_checker", handle, "")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if prPatchCheckerQueue == nil {
|
|
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("Unable to create pr_patch_checker Queue")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
go graceful.GetManager().RunWithShutdownFns(prPatchCheckerQueue.Run)
|
|
|
|
go graceful.GetManager().RunWithShutdownContext(InitializePullRequests)
|
|
|
|
return nil
|
|
|
|
}
|