* Some refactors related repository model
* Move more methods out of repository
* Move repository into models/repo
* Fix test
* Fix test
* some improvements
* Remove unnecessary function
* Ensure that git daemon export ok is created for mirrors
There is an issue with #16508 where it appears that create repo requires that the
repo does not exist. This causes #17241 where an error is reported because of this.
This PR fixes this and also runs update-server-info for mirrors and generated repos.
Fix#17241
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* DBContext is just a Context
This PR removes some of the specialness from the DBContext and makes it context
This allows us to simplify the GetEngine code to wrap around any context in future
and means that we can change our loadRepo(e Engine) functions to simply take contexts.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* another place that needs to set the initial context
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* avoid race
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* change attachment error
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Don't automatically delete repository files if they are present
Prior to this PR Gitea would delete any repository files if they are
present during creation or migration. This can in certain circumstances
lead to data-loss and is slightly unpleasant.
This PR provides a mechanism for Gitea to adopt repositories on creation
and otherwise requires an explicit flag for deletion.
PushCreate is slightly different - the create will cause adoption if
that is allowed otherwise it will delete the data if that is allowed.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Update swagger
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix tests and migrate overwrite
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @lunny
Only offer to adopt or overwrite if the user can do that.
Allow the site administrator to adopt or overwrite in all
circumstances
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Use setting.Repository.DefaultBranch for the default branch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Always set setting.Repository.DefaultBranch
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* update swagger
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* update templates
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* ensure repo closed
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Rewrite of adoption as per @6543 and @lunny
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Apply suggestions from code review
* update swagger
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* missing not
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* add modals and flash reporting
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Make the unadopted page searchable
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add API
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Fix swagger
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix swagger
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Handle empty and non-master branched repositories
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* placate lint
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* remove commented out code
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Add configurable Trust Models
Gitea's default signature verification model differs from GitHub. GitHub
uses signatures to verify that the committer is who they say they are -
meaning that when GitHub makes a signed commit it must be the committer.
The GitHub model prevents re-publishing of commits after revocation of a
key and prevents re-signing of other people's commits to create a
completely trusted repository signed by one key or a set of trusted
keys.
The default behaviour of Gitea in contrast is to always display the
avatar and information related to a signature. This allows signatures to
be decoupled from the committer. That being said, allowing arbitary
users to present other peoples commits as theirs is not necessarily
desired therefore we have a trust model whereby signatures from
collaborators are marked trusted, signatures matching the commit line
are marked untrusted and signatures that match a user in the db but not
the committer line are marked unmatched.
The problem with this model is that this conflicts with Github therefore
we need to provide an option to allow users to choose the Github model
should they wish to.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Adjust locale strings
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* as per @6543
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Update models/gpg_key.go
* Add migration for repository
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Replace all calls to os.Remove/os.RemoveAll by retrying util.Remove/util.RemoveAll and remove circular dependencies from util.
Fix#12339
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* Add organization wide labels
Implement organization wide labels similar to organization wide
webhooks. This lets you create individual labels for organizations that can be used
for all repos under that organization (so being able to reuse the same
label across multiple repos).
This makes it possible for small organizations with many repos to use
labels effectively.
Fixes#7406
* Add migration
* remove comments
* fix tests
* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
Removed unused translation string
* show org labels in issue search label filter
* Use more clear var name
* rename migration after merge from master
* comment typo
* update migration again after rebase with master
* check for orgID <=0 per guillep2k review
* fmt
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* remove unused code
* Make sure RepoID is 0 when searching orgID per code review
* more changes/code review requests
* More descriptive translation var per code review
* func description/delete comment when issue label deleted instead of hiding it
* remove comment
* only use issues in that repo when calculating number of open issues for org label on repo label page
* Add integration test for IssuesSearch API with labels
* remove unused function
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* Use subquery in GetLabelIDsInReposByNames
* Fix tests to use correct orgID
* fix more tests
* IssuesSearch api now uses new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition. Add a few more tests as well
* update comment for clarity
* Revert previous code change now that we can use the new BuildLabelNamesIssueIDsCondition
* Don't sort repos by date in IssuesSearch API
After much debugging I've found a strange issue where in some cases MySQL will return a different result than other enigines if a query is sorted by a null collumn. For example with our integration test data where we don't set updated_unix in repository fixtures:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 45
Returns different results for MySQL than other engines. However, the similar query:
SELECT `id`, `owner_id`, `owner_name`, `lower_name`, `name`, `description`, `website`, `original_service_type`, `original_url`, `default_branch`, `num_watches`, `num_stars`, `num_forks`, `num_issues`, `num_closed_issues`, `num_pulls`, `num_closed_pulls`, `num_milestones`, `num_closed_milestones`, `is_private`, `is_empty`, `is_archived`, `is_mirror`, `status`, `is_fork`, `fork_id`, `is_template`, `template_id`, `size`, `is_fsck_enabled`, `close_issues_via_commit_in_any_branch`, `topics`, `avatar`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix` FROM `repository` ORDER BY updated_unix DESC LIMIT 15 OFFSET 30
Returns the same results.
This causes integration tests to fail on MySQL in certain cases but would never show up in a real installation. Since this API call always returns issues based on the optionally provided repo_priority_id or the issueID itself, there is no change to results by changing the repo sorting method used to get ids earlier in the function.
* linter is back!
* code review
* remove now unused option
* Fix newline at end of files
* more unused code
* update to master
* check for matching ids before query
* Update models/issue_label.go
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Update models/issue_label.go
* update comments
* Update routers/org/setting.go
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Lunny Xiao
zeripath
6543
赵智超
mrsdizzie