|
|
|
Core wayland protocol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- glyph cache
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- dnd, figure out large object transfer: through wayland protocol or
|
|
|
|
pass an fd through the compositor to the other client and let them
|
|
|
|
sort it out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- copy-n-paste, store data in server (only one mime-type available)
|
|
|
|
or do X style (content mime-type negotiation, but data goes away
|
|
|
|
when client quits).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- protocol for setting the cursor image
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- should we have a mechanism to attach surface to cursor for
|
|
|
|
guaranteed non-laggy drag?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- drawing cursors, moving them, cursor themes, attaching surfaces
|
|
|
|
to cursors. How do you change cursors when you mouse over a
|
|
|
|
text field if you don't have subwindows? This is what we do: a
|
|
|
|
client can set a cursor for a surface and wayland will set that
|
|
|
|
on enter and revert to default on leave
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Discard buffer, as in "wayland discarded your buffer, it's no
|
|
|
|
longer visible, you can stop updating it now.", reattach, as in "oh
|
|
|
|
hey, I'm about to show your buffer that I threw away, what was it
|
|
|
|
again?". for wayland system compositor vt switcing, for example,
|
|
|
|
to be able to throw away the surfaces in the session we're
|
|
|
|
switching away from. for minimized windows that we don't want live
|
|
|
|
thumb nails for. etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Consolidate drm buffer upload with a create_buffer request, returns
|
|
|
|
buffer object we can use in surface.attach, cache.upload and
|
|
|
|
input.attach? Will increase object id usage significantly, each
|
|
|
|
buffer swap allocates and throws away a new id. Does consolidate
|
|
|
|
the details of a buffer very nicely though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compositor.create_buffer(new_id, visual, name, stride, width, height)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
surface.attach(buffer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cache.upload(buffer, x, y, width, height)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
input.set_cursor(buffer, hotspot_x, hotspot_y)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't increase id usage too much, can keep buffers around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Move/resize protocol in the style of the dnd protocol: a surface
|
|
|
|
who has a grabbed device can send a request to initiate a
|
|
|
|
resize(top/bottom+rigth/left) or a move. The compositor will then
|
|
|
|
resize or move the window and take into account windows, panels and
|
|
|
|
screen edges and constrain and snap the motion accordingly. As the
|
|
|
|
cursor moves, the compositor sends resize or move (maybe not move
|
|
|
|
events?) events to the app, which responds by attaching a new
|
|
|
|
surface at the new size (optionally, reducing the allocated space
|
|
|
|
to satisfy aspect ratio or resize increments).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Initial placement of surfaces. Guess we can do, 1)
|
|
|
|
surface-relative (menus), 2) pointer-relative (tooltips and
|
|
|
|
right-click menus) or 3) server-decides (all other top-levels).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- When a surface is the size of the screen and on top, we can set the
|
|
|
|
scanout buffer to that surface directly. Like compiz unredirect
|
|
|
|
top-level window feature. Except it won't have any protocol state
|
|
|
|
side-effects and the client that owns the surface won't know. We
|
|
|
|
lose control of updates. Should work well for X server root window
|
|
|
|
under wayland. Should be possible for yuv overlays as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- what about cursors then? maybe use hw cursors if the cursor
|
|
|
|
satisfies hw limitations (64x64, only one cursor), switch to
|
|
|
|
composited cursors if not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- clients needs to allocate the surface to be suitable for
|
|
|
|
scanout, which they can do whenever they go fullscreen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- multihead, screen geometry and crtc layout protocol, hotplug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- input device discovery, hotplug
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Advertise axes as part of the discovery, use something like
|
|
|
|
"org.wayland.input.x" to identify the axes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- keyboard state, layout events at connect time and when it
|
|
|
|
changes, keyboard leds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- relative events
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- multi touch?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- synaptics, 3-button emulation, scim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- sparse/gcc plugin based idl compiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- crack?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- xml based description instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- actually make batch/commit batch up commands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- auth; We need to generate a random socket name and advertise that
|
|
|
|
on dbus along with a connection cookie. Something like a method
|
|
|
|
that returns the socket name and a connection cookie. The
|
|
|
|
connection cookie is just another random string that the client
|
|
|
|
must pass to the wayland server to become authenticated. The
|
|
|
|
Wayland server generates the cookie on demand when the dbus method
|
|
|
|
is called and expires it after 5s or so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- or just pass the fd over dbus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- drm bo access control, authentication, flink_to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Range protocol may not be sufficient... if a server cycles through
|
|
|
|
2^32 object IDs we don't have a way to handle wrapping. And since
|
|
|
|
we hand out a range of 256 IDs to each new clients, we're just
|
|
|
|
talking about 2^24 clients. That's 31 years with a new client
|
|
|
|
every minute... Maybe just use bigger ranges, then it's feasible
|
|
|
|
to track and garbage collect them when a client dies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Add protocol to let applications specify the effective/logical
|
|
|
|
surface rectangle, that is, the edge of the window, ignoring drop
|
|
|
|
shadows and other padding. The compositor needs this for snapping
|
|
|
|
and constraining window motion. Also, maybe communicate the opaque
|
|
|
|
region of the window (or just a conservative, simple estimate), to
|
|
|
|
let the compositor reduce overdraw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- multi gpu, needs queue and seqno to wait on in requests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients and ports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- port gtk+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- eek, so much X legacy stuff there...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- draw window decorations in gtkwindow.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- start from alexl's client-side-windows branch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Details about pointer grabs. wayland doesn't have active grabs,
|
|
|
|
menus will behave subtly different. Under X, clicking a menu
|
|
|
|
open grabs the pointer and clicking outside the window pops down
|
|
|
|
the menu and swallows the click. without active grabs we can't
|
|
|
|
swallow the click. I'm sure there much more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Port Qt? There's already talk about this on the list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- X on Wayland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- move most of the code from xf86-video-intel into a Xorg wayland
|
|
|
|
module.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- don't ask KMS for available output and modes, use the info from
|
|
|
|
the wayland server. then stop mooching off of drmmode.c.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- map multiple wayland input devices to MPX in Xorg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- rootless; avoid allocating and setting the front buffer, draw
|
|
|
|
window decorations in the X server (!), how to map input?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- gnome-shell as a wayland session compositor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- runs as a client of the wayland session compositor, uses
|
|
|
|
clutter+egl on wayland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- talks to an Xorg server as the compositing and window manager
|
|
|
|
for that server and renders the output to a wayland surface.
|
|
|
|
the Xorg server should be modified to take input from the system
|
|
|
|
compositor through gnome-shell, but not allocate a front buffer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- make gnome-shell itself a nested wayland server and allow native
|
|
|
|
wayland clients to connect and can native wayland windows with
|
|
|
|
the windows from the X server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- qemu as a wayland client; session surface as X case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- qemu has too simple acceleration, so a Wayland backend like the
|
|
|
|
SDL/VNC ones it has now is trivial.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- paravirt: forward wayland screen info as mmio, expose gem ioctls as mmio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- mapping vmem is tricky, should try to only use ioctl (pwrite+pread)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- not useful for Windows without a windows paravirt driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- two approaches: 1) do a toplevel qemu window, or 2) expose a
|
|
|
|
wayland server in the guest that forwards to the host wayland
|
|
|
|
server, ie a "remote" compositor, but with the gem buffers
|
|
|
|
shared. could do a wl_connection directly on mmio memory, with
|
|
|
|
head and tail pointers. use an alloc_head register to indicate
|
|
|
|
desired data to write, if it overwrites tail, block guest. just
|
|
|
|
a socket would be easier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- moblin as a wayland compositor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- clutter as a wayland compositors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- argh, mutter
|