There are some places where we can make some cosmetic changes
to make code simpler and easier to read. Make these cosmetic
changes. Note that they do not change the code behavior.
Signed-off-by: Leandro Ribeiro <leandro.ribeiro@collabora.com>
Try to make drm_output_state_propose a little more clear by reducing
divergence between plane and renderer modes towards the end, removing
a possibly-surprising conditional continue.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reduce the scope of surface_overlap to where it's actually used, which
is only in the per-view loop, where it gets initialised and destroyed
every time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Previously we assumed that cursor planes occluded nothing and would
always be blended, but overlay and scanout planes would always occlude
what's behind them. This is not actually true, as we can support alpha
blending on any kind of plane type now.
Remove the special case, which might hopefully fix some weird display
issues along the way. (Noticed by inspection.)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
We used to use planes_region for the output regions which were being
displayed on hardware planes; before we grew zpos awareness, we couldn't
have any planes overlapping with each other, since the ordering would be
undefined.
Since the zpos awareness though, this region is unused, so we can just
remove it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
If a surface is not visible, then is does not matter if the view is on multiple
outputs. It will be skipped anyways when the output is rendered.
So check first if the surface is acually visible on the output before doing any
checks that might force rendering. This avoids unnecessary rendering.
Signed-off-by: Michael Olbrich <m.olbrich@pengutronix.de>
Mode change from mixed-mode to renderer-only means we should no longer
try to place views in HW planes (as we composite everything into the
primary plane) thus we should avoid that whenever that happens.
In the same time we need to be able to place in mixed-mode/renderer-only
mode the cursor view into the cursor plane (if one is available).
This patch adds a further check to skip plane assignment when disabling
overlay support (when we switch to renderer-only mode), when drivers do
not have atomic-modeset or it has been disabled intentionally.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
Adds a further assert() to make sure we're not checking against invalid
values. This was seen in the wild when the kernel rejects the commit for
overlay resulting in a check for invalid zpos values.
Fixes: #304
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
when switching to mixed-mode of compositing
This way we avoid an (incorrect) duplicate check of zpos values. Also,
this would be needed because the renderer needs have the lowest zpos value
available as we don't (yet) properly support underlays, the primary
plane serves as our renderer.
Adds also a check to see if we try to assign a view to a plane with
a lower zpos value than the one assigned to the primary when switching
to mixed-mode of compositing.
Fixes: #304
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
It makes much more sense to be there. It adds some additional drm_debug()
statements to provide reason for failing to place the view in the HW
plane. Makes the reason for failing more accurate.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@collabora.com>
Avoids the need to retrieve the DRM framebuffer in each function and
re-uses the one got before constructing the zpos candidate list.
Takes another reference for the scanout as to live the state, like
there's one for the overlay bit.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
As we already have a potential plane available to use, pass it
over the _prepare_overlay_view instead of trying to find one
from the backend plane list.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@collabora.com>
In this manner we will allow views to reach the overlay (or underlays)
even if the damage tracking will detect that the new view will
occlude the view underneath it.
Renames occluded_region to planes_region, and uses occluded_region
to represent the region where we add each view's visible-and-opaque region.
Sprinkle some comments about each region.
Re-uses the view's clipped region to determine visible-and-opaque region
which is accumulated (for both renderer and HW planes cases) into
occluded_region. The current view's clipped_region is then checked against
occluded_region.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@collabora.com>
We can determine if the pixel format used by the clients buffer is
scan-out capable much sooner, so do it when constructing the zpos
candidate list. It also removes the checks in their respective
prepare_ functions.
Avoids the situation where we'd need to retrieve the DRM framebuffer each time
when checking the pixel format.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
function
The idea is to place pixel the format checks in a common part and until
then, to make it available as a function so we can re-use easily.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
In order to better optimize view assignment to HW planes, we construct
an intermediary zpos candidate list which is used aggregate all suitable
planes for handling scan-out capable client buffers.
We go over it twice: once to construct it and once to pick-and-choose a
suitable plane based its highest zpos position.
In order to maintain the view order correctly we track current zpos
value being applied to the plane state and use it when trying to place
a view into a plane.
Pass the computed zpos value to be applied to the plane state.
Signed-off-by: Marius Vlad <marius.vlad@collabora.com>
Suggested-by: Daniel Stone <daniel.stone@collabora.com>
Due to an error in driving GitLab, this commit erroneously contained the
entirety of !267 (zpos support in the KMS backend) squashed into one
single commit, pushed into master.
In order to keep the history clean, this is being reverted; a rebased
version of !267 with the clear individual commits which were already
present will be applied in its place.
This reverts commit 95e3b0deae.
Make GBM optional in case GL renderer is disabled. This allows to
build Weston with DRM backend without Mesa dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Currently drm-layer supports HDCP1.4 using connector property:
Content Protection. This property if available for a platform, can be
read and set for requesting content-protection.
Also, the patch series [1] adds HDCP2.2 support in drm, and patch [2]
adds support to send udev events for change in connector properties,
made by the kernel.
This patch adds these HDCP connector properties in weston, and exposes
the content-protection support to the client for drm-backend.
It adds the enums to represent 'Content Protection' and 'Content Type'
connector properties exposed by drm layer. It adds a member
'protection' in drm_output_state, to store the desired protection
from the weston_output in the drm-backend output-repaint cycle. This
is then used to write the HDCP connector properties for the drm_heads
attached to the drm_output.
The kernel sends uevents to the user-space for any change made by it
in the "Content Protection" connector property. No event is sent in
case of change in the property made by the user-space.
It means, when there is a change of the property value from "DESIRED"
to "ENABLE" i.e. successful authentication by the kernel, a uevent
will be generated, but in case of userspace requesting for disabling
the protection by writing "UNDESIRED" into the property, no uevent
will be generated.
This patch also adds support for handling new udev events for HDCP
connector property changes. Any such change, triggers change in the
weston_head's current_protection.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/57233/#rev7
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/303903/?series=57233&rev=7
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
drm_assign_planes() is called to separate views out and decide what will
be taken out for plane composition and what will be left for the
renderer to compose.
It calls drm_output_propose_state() in order to find a good
configuration, which itself has a number of helpers that it calls. Break
these out into a separate file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Maxime Roussin-Bélanger
Leandro Ribeiro
Daniel Stone
Michael Olbrich
Marius Vlad
Marius Vlad
Stefan Agner
Ankit Nautiyal