A more descriptive name to not be confused with create_client().
v2: Rebased: fix also devices-test.c.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Marek Chalupa <mchqwerty@gmail.com>
Mostly remove headers that aren't actually needed for anything.
Add stdint.h to permit dropping xf86drm.h, which is otherwise unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington <bryce@osg.samsung.com>
Acked-by: Marek Chalupa <mchqwerty@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
There was an issue recently in screen-share.c where config.h was not
being included, resulting in the wrong definition for off_t being used on
32 bit systems. I checked and I don't think this problem is happening
elsewhere, but to help avoid this sort of problem in the future, I went
through and made sure that config.h is included first whenever system
headers are included.
The config.h header should be included before any system headers, failing
to do this can result in the wrong type sizes being defined on certain
systems, e.g. off_t from sys/types.h
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wedgbury <andrew.wedgbury@realvnc.com>
This reverts commit 2396aec684.
This exact version of the sub-surface protocol has been copied into
Wayland core. Therefore it must be removed from here to avoid build
conflicts and useless duplication.
No other changes to sub-surface protocol consumers are needed, the
identical API is now offered by libwayland-client and libwayland-server.
The commit adding sub-surfaces to Wayland is:
Author: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
protocol: add sub-surfaces to the core
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
It should not be possible to create a loop by nesting sub-surfaces.
Currently Weston fails this test.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
Add a test for varying the object destruction order in a complex
sub-surface tree.
This test attemps to fuzz the destruction of a sub-surface tree to make
sure the server does not crash on any wl_surface or wl_subsurface
destruction sequence.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.co.uk>
For testing the protocol behaviour only:
- linking a surface to a parent does not fail
- position and placement requests do not fail
- bad linking and arguments do fail
- passing a surface as a sibling from a different set fails
- different destruction sequences do not crash
- setting a surface as its own parent fails
- nesting succeeds
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>
Bryce Harrington
Pekka Paalanen
Marek Chalupa
Andrew Wedgbury
Pekka Paalanen